Autori: Sorin Fildan, Ştefan-Ioan Lucaciuc

Editorial: Universul Juridic, STUDII ŞI CERCETÃRI JURIDICE EUROPENE, p.168-178, 2012.

Rezumat:

Regarded as a distinct form of the appeal to an enforcement procedure, the appeal regarding the clarification of meaning, span or application of the enforceable title invites the court to pronounce upon the interpretation of the content of the enforceable title, unlike the appeal to the enforcement proper, in which the court is requested to verify aspects pertaining to the legality of the enforcement procedure.
This being the distinction of essence between the two forms of appeal to the enforcement procedure, so long as the legitimate interests of the parties to the enforcement or those of third parties can be affected exclusively by the acts of enforcement or by the refusal of the enforcing body to start an enforcement procedure, there is no logical reason for regulating the possibility of promoting an appeal regarding the clarification of the enforceable title at any time during the enforcement, regardless of critiques leveled against damaging acts of enforcement. Consequently, de lege lata, even if the request for clarification of the meaning, span or application of the enforceable title may be submitted an any time during the enforcement, when the interested party seeks to obtain the alteration or annihilation of the effects of a certain act of enforcement, it will have to promote the appeal in the 15-day term regulated by art. 401 in the Code of civil procedure (art. 704 par. 1 in Law no. 134/2010 – the future Code of civil procedure).

Cuvinte cheie: Appeal to an enforcement procedure; interpretation of the content of the enforceable title; legitimate interests of the parties; the future Code of civil procedure.